How the Jews continue to fool the world with Fables and Myths
As I was pondering a reply to the latest Jewish propaganda ad published in the Colville weekly called the "Sun," it occurred to me, that parts of this propaganda ad might not be that far off. See: http://factsandlogic.org (This was found as their propaganda "Flame" ad 49e, but they may have relocated or changed changed it)
I am talking about the point that was made in the "Flame" ad, that the Jews at one time considered themselves Palestinians. I have never heard the Jews link themselves with Palestinians before, let alone heard them calling themselves Palestinians. Their case before the Court of Public opinion must be coming very difficult to support, with the recent destruction of some 130 homes, making more then a thousand people homeless, in the Palestinian town of Rafah, in Gaza, See: http://www.rafahtoday.org/. I provide the following quote from the "Flame" ad - "The reality is that the concept of "Palestinians" is one that did not exist until about 1948, when the Arab inhabitants of what until then was Palestine, wished to differentiate themselves from the Jews. Until then, the Jews were the Palestinians," end of quote.
Really? So the Arabs were not Palestinians until after 1948, because the Jews were called the Palestinians before that? This is an interesting but also an absurd concept, in my opinion, one I have not even considered to research before. In an earlier article I wrote to counter with the truth, an other Jewish "Flame" propaganda ad titled "The Golden Heights" to whom do they belong?"" Published in the "Sun," I wrote the following paragraph:
"The people occupying the present day land area called Israel, are, for the most, NOT comprised of Biblical Yisraelites (i.e. descendants of Ya'aqob/Yisrael through Shem, son of Noah). The Jewish people are mostly Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar-Turkish-East European descent through Ashkenaz. Ashkenaz was a son of Gomer, who was a son of Japheth, who was a son of Noah. Gen. 10:3. The Ashkenazi Jews are "Japhethites," not "Semites." The Palestinians are a people originally descending from the ancient Philistines, now amalgamated with Arabs. Strangely enough, in a unique twist, the name of the territory of the historical enemies of the Yisraelites (who no longer inhabit the land) has become the familiar title of "Palestine," for all of what was at one time known as the 'Holy Land.' The word Palestine is a derivative of the word Philistine(s), the ancient inhabitants of "Palestine."
In that earlier article, I did not go into the details about the etymology of the word Palestine, but any student of the Scriptures should not have too much of a problem doing so. This is something the Jews obviously did not do prior to placing their ad in the "Sun," unless of course, the Jews actually want to be considered as the Philistines of the Ancient Old Testament Scriptures, who were the adversaries of ancient Israel.
In Strong's Concordance, "Palestina, and Palestine" are actually one and the same word (Strong's #6429). The definition as supplied by Strong's is: Pel-eh'-sheth; from Strong's #6428; rolling, i.e. migratory; Pelesheth, a region of Syria:- Palestina, Palestine, Philistia, Philistines.
According to Strong's Concordance, Palestine is directly associated with, and named after the ancient Philistines, the original inhabitants of the land of Palestine. The land area still carries their name, so there is not too much doubt about it. The first occurrence of the word "Palestine" is in Exodus 15: 14, where the reference is made to the "inhabitants of Palestina" by Moses. In Hebrew, the word is "Philistia," taken from the name of the Philistines, the bitter enemies of the ancient Israelites (not the Jews). The area was also the home of the ancient Canaanites. This land was inhabited by the amalgamated Arab people of the Middle East hundreds, maybe thousands of years before the word Jew ever existed, (at least from the time of Abram and Lot), and many years before Israel invaded Palestine. Palestine as we all should know, was conquered by the Israelites under the leadership of Joshua, about 1200 BC. This was at least 2200 years before the invention of Talmudic Jewism, which was invented sometime after 700 years AD, from which the term Jew is derived. The association with one's religion is quite common in our time, similar to the term Christian referring to an adherent of Christianity, and the term Muslim as an adherent to Islam. The Jew then, is simply an adherent to Jewism. Nationality or race has nothing to do with one's religion. Before the English translation of the Bible, the letter "J" and the word Jew, (a miss-translation of the word "Yahudi") did not even exist.
If Jews want to be known as Philistines in the order to have some historical claim to Palestine, the ancient enemy of Israel, so be it. But, in either case, the fact still remains, most Jews (about 90%) are not related to the ancient tribes of Israel. As for the right to any of the land based on supposed historical claim, the Jews have none, unless they can trace their ancestry back about 3500 years to the original Philistines, or to the ancient Canaanites, who were in fact the ancient inhabitants of the land. These early people, amalgamated with the various Arab tribes over thousands of years, were and are the descendants of the people now dwelling in the area as Palestinians (migratory people). It is also a fact, that most Jews are not descendants of Abraham, or of Jacob/Israel, however, most of the Arabs are descendants of Abraham through Hagar, the Egyptian handmaid of Sarah, and mother of Abraham's son Ishmael.
The division of the land of Palestine into a partitioned area for Jews and Arabs, under the Balfour Declaration, is the only claim that Jews have to Palestine, and even this was done only through mandate by the "League of Nations" (future UN), in my opinion, to rid most of Europe and England from the historical negative influence of the Jew. (See our document the "1000 year" history of the Jew).
The division of the land into partitioned areas has nothing to do with the historical claims of the people who are living there, Jews, Arabs, or any other people group. It is simply the exercise of the weak over the strong, who has the biggest gun, or the most influence with other powerful governments. This has, until now, clearly been to the advantage of the Jews. Billions of dollars has filtered into the Jewish State from America, resulting in hatred of America and the Jews, by the oppressed people it produces. (See my document "The Golan Heights").
The question as to who, Arab, or Jew, has the right to what portion of partitioned land in the middle east, using the original mandate of the Balfour Declaration, is answered by what the Jews, with American money and American military equipment, have done to destroy their Palestinian neighbors, an on-going process at the time of this article. It is also not that difficult to look at a map of recent Middle-East history to determine which country is "occupying" someone else's land, even if it was partitioned under the Balfour Declaration. Even though some of the territory was given as a homeland to the Jews by the strong arm pressure of the League of Nations, (now called the UN) does not make the Jews the original inhabitants of the land, that is, unless they are actually the physical descendants of the ancient Philistines, which I doubt.
I do hope, that the Arab people, i.e. the Palestinians, are successful in their endeavor to be able to return to their historical homelands, and to establish a Sovereign Free State, before the land is completely destroyed and consumed by the Jews. As for the claim by the "Flame" ad, that they [the Arabs] are "feverishly preparing for their next assault" [against the Jews], I would not be privy to any of that kind of information. And, as for the "Flame" ad, and I quote, "The web of lies and myths that the Arab propaganda machine has created plays an important role in the unrelenting quest to destroy the State of Israel," end of quote - all I can comment on this claim, is, that I have not to-date seen an Arab sponsored Propaganda ad in any of the local papers, or in the Colville "Sun," but I have seen plenty of miss-leading, Mythical, Propaganda ads by the Jewish sponsored "Flame" organization. This only provides me with the evidence of on-going Jewish propaganda, Fables and Myths. "What a shame that the world has accepted most of it!"
Yochannan Willem,
Editor for Biblelogic.com